🔗 Share this article

Picture this: a smiling Rasmus Højlund wearing Napoli's colors. Now, place it with a dejected the Slovenian forward in a Manchester United kit, looking as if he just missed a sitter. Don't bother locating a real picture of him missing; background information is the enemy. Now, add some goal stats in a large, comical font. Remember some emoticons. Share the image everywhere.

Will you point out that Højlund's tally features scores in the Champions League while his counterpart does not compete in continental tournaments? Of course not. And will you note that four of the Dane's goals came against Belarus and Greece, or that Denmark is much stronger to Sesko's Slovenia and generates far more scoring opportunities. You run online for a major brand, pure interaction is your livelihood, United are the prime target, and nuance is your sworn enemy.

Thus the cycle of content spins. The next job is to sift through a 44-minute podcast featuring Peter Schmeichel and find the part where he describes the acquisition of Sesko "strange". Just before, where Schmeichel qualifies his comments by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, remove that part. Nobody needs that. Just ensure "strange" and "Sesko" appear together in the headline. The audience will be outraged.

This Time of Promise and Hasty Opinions

Mid-autumn has long been one of my preferred times to watch football. The leaves swirl, the wind turns, the teams and tactics are newly formed, all is novel and yet everything is beginning to form. The stars of the coming months are planting their flags. The transfer window is shut. Nobody is talking about the quadruple yet. Everyone are in contention. At this precise point, all is possibility.

However, for similar reasons, mid-autumn has also been one of my least favourite times to read about football. Because although nothing has yet been settled, something must always be getting settled. Jack Grealish is resurgent. The German talent has been a major letdown. Could Semenyo be the top performer in the league right now? We need an answer now.

Sesko as Patient Zero

In many ways, Benjamin Sesko feels like the archetype in this context, a player caught between football's two countervailing, unavoidable forces. The imperative to delay definitive judgment, to let technical development and strategic understanding to mature. And the demand to generate instant verdicts, a constant stream of takes and jokes, out-of-context criticisms and pointless contrasts, a puzzle that can not truly be circled.

I do not propose to provide a in-depth analysis of Sesko's time at Manchester United so far. He has started four times in the top flight in a highly unpredictable team, found the net twice, and had a grand total of 116 contacts with the ball. What precisely are we evaluating? And do I propose to replicate the pundits' notable debate "Argument Over Benjamin Sesko", in which two famous analysts argue thrillingly on a popular show over whether he needs 10 goals to be deemed successful this season (one pundit), or whether it is more like twelve or thirteen (the other).

A Cruel Environment

For all this I loved watching Sesko at Leipzig: a powerful, screeching racing car of a forward, playing in a team ideally suited to his abilities: given the freedom to attack but also the freedom to fail. Partly this is why United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "brutal verdicts" are handed down in roughly the duration it takes to load a short advertisement, the club with the largest and most pitiless gap between the time and air he requires, and the time and air he is going to get.

There was a case of this during the international break, when a widely shared chart handily stated that the player had been deemed – by a wide margin – the poorest acquisition of the summer transfer window by a survey of 20 agents. And of course, the media are by no means alone in this. Club channels, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a suspiciously high number of fake followers: all parties with skin in the game is now basically aligned along the same principles, an ecosystem deliberately nosed towards controversy.

The Mental Cost

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What is happening to ourselves? Do we realize, on any level, what this infinite stream of aggravation is doing to our brains? Separate from the inherent strangeness of playing in the middle of this, knowing on a bizarre chain-reaction level that each aspect about them is now essentially content, product, open-source property to be packaged and exchanged.

And yes, partly this is because it's Manchester United, the entity that keeps nourishing the cycle, a major institution that must constantly be generating the big feelings. However, in part this is a seasonal affliction, a pendulum of judgment most clearly and cruelly glimpsed at this time of year, roughly four weeks after the window has closed. All summer long we have been coveting players, praising them, drooling over them. Yet, just a few weeks in, a lot of those same players are now being disdained as broken goods. Should we start to be concerned about a new signing? Did Arsenal actually need Viktor Gyökeres necessary? What was the purpose of another expensive buy?

A Wider Issue

It seems fitting that he meets Liverpool on the weekend: a team at once 13 months unbeaten at their stadium in the Premier League and yet in their own state of feverish crisis, like filing a a report on a person who went to the shops half an hour ago. Defensively suspect. Mohamed Salah finished. The striker waste of money. The coach losing his hair.

Maybe we have not yet quite grasped the way the narrative of football has begun to supplant football the actual game, to inflect the way we view it, an whole competition repivoted around talking points and reaction, an activity that occurs in the background while we scroll through our phones, unable to disconnect from the constant flow of opinions and more takes. Perhaps Sesko taking the hit right now. But in a way, everyone is losing something here.